Boop!\u00a0 A strange thing happened today, which is that an article for which I gave an interview in January in Pittsburgh has just now materialized, and I\u2019ve gotten in some mild internet trouble for some of the things I said, which I just wanted to clarify, mainly because it\u2019s interesting how these things have the ability to recycle in strange, unexpected ways, and because the things that seem to have been the most objectionable are, actually, the things I believe in the strongest, but with some caveats. \u00a0Also: it feels right to articulate, in my own, typed words, these thoughts as it seems as if my rapid-fire interview is being scrutinized in some detail! \u00a0Now, here<\/a> is the article in question, by Elizabeth Bloom if you care to look at it. Please note that the reason I sat for it was that my chamber opera, Dark Sisters<\/em>, was being presented by Pittsburgh Opera, and I went out there for a few days to help do press for it, sit in on some rehearsals, etc. \u00a0This was in January. \u00a0I don’t understand why it has dropped, as it were, six months later.<\/p>\n
The first point of clarification: “He thinks, for example, that classical music could learn from how pop uses music software and recording studios. (\u201cI think classical electronic music always sounds like trash,\u201d he said.)” \u00a0Now, that is a crazy statement! \u00a0I’m not 100% sure what I was referring to, but certainly I can use myself as an example here. \u00a0When I first wrote this piece called Keep in Touch<\/em>, for Nadia and Antony and what essentially amounts to pre-recorded tape, I made the electronic elements myself using basically souped up GarageBand. \u00a0It wasn’t until Valgeir Sigur\u00f0sson started fondling it that I realized how trashy it sounded; it sounded about as trashy as when you turn on the radio and hear a great song but with MIDI strings. You’re like, “all that money and then this?” I think that the non-classical universe has citizens who simply spend more time in front of electronic instruments and computers, and it is meet and right to ring them up and ask for their counsel and assistance when dabbling in the more plugged-in corners, I think. I certainly wouldn’t dare try it totally alone. In the same way that I spent years in a darkened room basically snuggling with the score to Petrouchka<\/em>, there are people who spent those same years of their lives making samples, designing synthesizers, sitting in a darkened room of their own. So, that’s what that’s all about; I can’t actually think about any “Classical electronic music” off the top of my head, with the possible exception of Jacob Cooper’s Silver Threads<\/em><\/a>, which you should all buy, and also which came out three months after I said this so obvz I hadn’t heard it, and also which I think sounds great, partially, I imagine, because he rang up Damian Taylor, who, in addition to having the same birthday as I do, is one of the smartest and nicest and most sensitive programmer\/engineer\/computer types around. \u00a0I certainly didn’t have anything else in mind, with the possible exception of those v.v.v.v. early Babbitt pieces<\/a> that just sound like straight up R2D2, but that’s more funny to me than anything else. \u00a0Bleep boop!<\/p>\n
Then, a more delicate situation here:<\/p>\n
The final thing I want to say here, which is perhaps more to the point, is that the way music gets paid for is really unknowable to me. I can’t pretend to understand it. In the time that I wrote this blogpost, in fact, a really awful cut<\/a> to the ENO’s budget in London was announced; I love that company and love working there and with them \u2014 it can only be bad news, and yet, they seem to have spun it as potentially okay news? \u00a0I tried to follow the Minnesota negotiations and between the paper, Facebook, blogs, in-person conversations \u2014 at a certain point I just got so exasperated and frustrated by the idea of this semi-visible world of fighting people messing up our lives \u2014 it feels like Zeus and Hera, with their eternal squabbles and jealousies and resentments \u2014 people telling half truths, leaking information, good faith and bad faith arguments in the same sentence, with various intermediaries and intercessors throwing incense around. San Diego felt rather the same way; what’s going on at the Met seems the same way. It feels, sometimes, that the adults are fighting and that we’re the kids, cowering in our rooms pretending not to hear. I’m sure I’m not the only person who’s fantasized about just running away from home, and trying to find a more direct way to communicate between musicians and audiences, all of whom, I think, are going to figure it out in spite of<\/em> these crises and inevitable transformations both real, imagined, and somewhere in between. Sometimes, I wonder if a closing doesn’t, in some way, shift energy: has anybody else noticed a wonderful explosion of chamber opera, a heightened attention to the 20-person operation compared to the slightly larger model recently in New York and elsewhere? \u00a0I feel like in London I can’t open a door without a brilliant amplified chamber opera popping out; this isn’t to say that it exists to the exclusion<\/em> of Don Carlo, it’s just a different model.<\/p>\n
And one final thought, more shop talk than anything else. For young composers, writing an orchestra piece can feel like the ne plus ultra<\/em> of achievements, the distant summit to climb. As I said, writing for orchestra is amazing and I love it, but it doesn’t have to be for everybody. Think about Steve Reich, for whom you all know I have deep deep love. Homegirl has written, what, two pieces for orchestra (The Four Sections<\/em>, and Three Movements<\/em>, one movement of which is repurposed)? \u00a0I guess The Desert Music<\/em> counts too but that works way better in the small, Alarm Will Sound edition<\/a>. \u00a0In a long-ass career, the pieces of his that are the most defining, the closest, I would argue, to the heart of the artist, are the ones for small amplified ensemble with voices pre-recorded on a tape or live or both: Different Trains, The Cave.\u00a0<\/em>Then, looking back another third of a century, the early works \u2014 the ones that made him a sort of household (u know what I mean) name, are for his friends: Music for 18<\/em>, Music for a Large Ensemble<\/em>. \u00a0I don’t want to put words in his mouth, but his is a career \u2014 as, I would argue, is Philip Glass’s \u2014 that was built on a foundation of knowing<\/strong>, in some fundamental way, that orchestras weren’t going to want to commission them ever ever, as I’m sure it must have seemed in the 1960’s and 70’s. Even though that changed for Philip \u2014 and he would be the first to tell you that it was a surprise, and indeed, the result of having made his name writing music outside of that tradition \u2014 \u00a0the music of his that, for me, bears a more intimate touch is the music he wrote for his friends. Going back to what I said in Pittsburgh \u00a0(“I\u2019ve always found the best thing to do is to make work that doesn\u2019t have to happen in a huge space”), I think the advice is solid. Knowing how to make music despite the Arts Council is practical and sensible. It doesn’t mean that in such a making, one is saying that DIY music is the only<\/em> way forward; it’s just a different skill-set. Writing a chamber opera doesn’t mean you don’t believe in grand; writing a piece of electronic music doesn’t mean you’ve abandoned the viola.<\/p>\n
The experience of writing a new piece for orchestra is very scary; I’ve had some wild rides where you find yourself quite bumped up against the wall of the way the week in which your piece is premiered is scheduled. Things they don’t teach you in school turn into the biggest logistical obstacles: unexpectedly reduced strings for the Mozart means a tech call to move the chairs for your piece which means 20 minutes less rehearsal which means… and so on. \u00a0I’ve written before<\/a> about the craziness of recordings in these situations. \u00a0It is very high-stress and I still get “first day of school” jitters in front of orchestras and usually need to sit down in a dark room after the first rehearsal, with a serious glass of wine. I have fought fought fought fought fought for more rehearsal time for new music; I have embarrassed myself, I have totally nailed or messed up the Confucian rituals of obeisance and deference some groups need, I have had nightmares about it, I have, in the thirty-nine seconds a composer is given to make comments, said clever things and blunt things and stupid things and funny things and things that fell flat. All of that having been said, there is nothing<\/strong><\/span> like that first moment when things start to emulsify in the room with the orchestra, when the little idea you had at your tiny desk has bloomed into this pulsing, shimmering thing, beautiful and ugly and surprising. It’s the Sorcerer’s Apprentice but strangely sanctioned \u2014 you’ve been allowed to manipulate seventy plus people, with their years of training and musicianship, into this twelve-minute distillation and explosion of an idea. It’s an experience I wish everybody could have, and it’s an opportunity for composers that I will fight for, both online and off.<\/p>\n