Pentecost is a really exciting moment in the year because it is all about language. Liturgically, what’s going on is a mirror to the Tower of Babel: a moment of linguistic comprehension through<\/em> confusion, a bright flash. In the Hebrew Bible, all of the people on earth speaking the same language is an affront to God; in the New Testament, foreign (in the corporeal sense) languages become a temporary point of connection between strangers. <\/p>\nOne of my all-time favorite Pentecost motets is Thomas Tallis’s Loquebantur Variis Linguis<\/em>. I’m including a recording here, as well as a link to a piece I wrote (called So to Speak <\/em><\/a>) that uses the same theme.<\/p>\n [audio:02 Loquebantur variis linguis.mp3] [audio:SoToSpeak.mp3] Okay now flash forward to today, Pentecost 2011! I went, this morning, to Westminster Abbey to hear them get their tongues united. They did Loquebantur Variis Linguis as part of a complicated procession around the space, so, one heard the voices without seeing the bodies. Delicious. Then, the anthem was Bach’s Der Geist hilft unser Schwachheit auf<\/em> which is a big imitative counterpoint back-and-forth crazyspace for the first bit, and then it resolves into the most gorgeous and simple chorale. I love this piece so much particularly because I have about nine recordings of it, each one in a totally different tempo. Fabulous.<\/p>\n We are ten days from the premiere of Two Boys<\/em>. There was a fun little thing: it’s a YouTube video here<\/a>, and a sassy little retort here<\/a>. There’s a microsite here<\/a>. There’s me being in a debate about the nature of things here<\/a>. There’s a half an hour of me and Craig Lucas talking<\/a> about everything under the sun. Go nuts!<\/p>\n I’m having a slightly fun time reading all the advance press in anticipation of not being able to read the reviews; it’s just too awful to think about. I think for my sanity I need to wait until it’s all done to really get involved, if at all. While I’m usually ambivalent about this stuff, I observed something that is almost universally true in England. When I ask somebody, “oh, how was Simon Boccanegra,” the answer was never to that question, but instead, “It got 3 stars!” or “It got 4 stars” or “The critics hated it.” It’s outrageous! That’s not what I asked! This happens, though, across the board with people involved in the arts, and it’s a curious business because obviously I could have googled the reviews. Instead, I ask because I wanted to know what you, nice lady, or you, kind sir, your own self thought when you went there. How were the notes, how were the rhythms, how was the singing, how was the story, did it work for you, did you have a nice night at the theater? I want details: I want to know what the production set out to do and whether or not it did it. I want to know how the cor anglais solo was in the Faust<\/em> (excellent, apparently!) and I want to know if the lighting was generous to the mouth. I feel like that’s a much healthier way to see any art. You go in with a kind and generous mind, and try to figure out what the thing is trying to do and whether or not it did it well. Really, it’s not unlike a restaurant in that way. <\/p>\n
\nThomas Tallis’s Loquebantur Variis Linguis<\/em>
\nThe Cambridge Singers \/ Rutter
\nBuy the whole album here<\/a><\/small><\/p>\n
\nNico Muhly So to Speak <\/em><\/a>
\nThe Juilliard Orchestra \/ Milarsky <\/small><\/p>\n
The thing that excites me so much about this Tallis are these little licks at the end of the phrases; when done right, you really get the effect of flaming tongues. I tried to get at the same grammatical hysteria in So to Speak<\/em>. I once rode on a plane to Grand Rapids, MI, next to a girl about my age who was just getting back from missionary work in Nigeria, where she claimed to have engaged in True Spiritual Warfare (her emphases), and also claimed to have spoken in tongues, at that time. What was touching and beautiful about her story wasn’t the fact that it was totally crazy but was instead that she articulated that her glossolalia was her profound and only<\/em> connection to other people of faith (who were missionaries from places where English is not spoken). I will add here that in addition to the gift of tongues, she got some pretty awesome braids.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/nicomuhly.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/work.6263923.1.sticker220x200-pad220x200f8f8f8.i-hated-justine-bieber-before-it-was-cool-v1-166x150.png\" "\\"work.6263923.1.sticker,220x200-pad,220x200,f8f8f8.i-hated-justine-bieber-before-it-was-cool-v1\\"")
<\/a>For me, the worst thing anybody can say about anything is that it’s overrated or underrated, because what that implies is that the rating has anything to do with the thing itself.<\/em> Yelp is filled with this kind of skewed logic, where essentially what’s not<\/strong> being discussed is the food, the texture, the mouthfeel, the drinks, but instead, some imagined disparity between press\/buzz\/hype and the bibimbap itself (have you noticed, also, that yelp reviews always begin, “my fianc\u00e9e and I went here the other night”?) The other direction is worse, too, where you say that so-and-so is such an underrated<\/strong> cook or composer or guitarist. The problem is that it very quickly bestows a sort of moral probity on not being in the press, or not being known by many people. The worst example of this is indie rock, I would say, and it has been endlessly ridiculed. It comes up in classical music, too, though, where a lot of people are obsessed with talking about the fact of John Luther Adams’s press or lack thereof, rather than taking that time to really listen to his (unbelievably gorgeous & powerful) music. <\/p>\n